Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jntrees

So, we agree, finally.

Once again, here’s your statement: ““Shooting someone in the back is unjustified, unless they were charging at someone with the intent to maim/kill.”

The black thug charged the cop, so the other cop was completely justified in shooting the attacker in the back.


215 posted on 06/17/2020 4:32:51 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: sergeantdave

Once again, here’s your statement: ““Shooting someone in the back is unjustified, unless they were charging at someone with the intent to maim/kill.”

The black thug charged the cop, so the other cop was completely justified in shooting the attacker in the back.

“The black thug...” I knew you had it in you.
I don’t know what reality you are currently living in but to say the “black thug charged the cop..” in totally and completely INSANE man. You try to make your point with outright LIES! He didn’t charge the cop, he was running AWAY from the cops.
What are you smoking tonight??


217 posted on 06/17/2020 4:46:48 PM PDT by jntrees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson