Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawley introduces bill targeting Big Tech companies over political censorship concerns
Fox News ^ | June 17 2020 | Adam Shaw, Jake Gibson

Posted on 06/17/2020 11:08:13 AM PDT by knighthawk

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced legislation Wednesday to give Americans the ability to sue major tech companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter if they engage in selective censorship of political speech.

The Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, cosponsored by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Mike Braun, R-Ind., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., would stop such companies from receiving immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, unless they update their terms of service to promise to operate in good faith.

“For too long, Big Tech companies like Twitter, Google and Facebook have used their power to silence political speech from conservatives without any recourse for users,” Hawley said in a statement. “Section 230 has been stretched and rewritten by courts to give these companies outlandish power over speech without accountability. Congress should act to ensure bad actors are not given a free pass to censor and silence their opponents.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigtech; bill; hawley; politicalcensorship

1 posted on 06/17/2020 11:08:13 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Never get it through the House. Litigation may be the only hope at this point.


2 posted on 06/17/2020 11:11:05 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Useless noise without the House. President needs to sign an Executive Order. Republicans passed a lot of Bills they knew would go nowhere.

When they had both houses, nothing.


3 posted on 06/17/2020 11:11:22 AM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Litigated to whom?
The supreme court? don’t hold your breath.


4 posted on 06/17/2020 11:12:05 AM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Well past time, but will be appreciated if done correctly.


5 posted on 06/17/2020 11:12:33 AM PDT by heshtesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

All you need is to say that the 1st Amendment applies to social media platforms as the new digital town square. It’s not difficult to end this.


6 posted on 06/17/2020 11:14:57 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasM1A

Yeah after yesterday it’s pretty obvious there is little hope there either. Rush always said he would tell us when it’s time to panic. Well I don’t know how much more it will take.


7 posted on 06/17/2020 11:20:19 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

HalleluYah!!!


8 posted on 06/17/2020 11:22:24 AM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam; USgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasM1A
Litigated to whom?

The supreme court? don’t hold your breath.

Senator Hawley also talks about that.


9 posted on 06/17/2020 11:25:52 AM PDT by Bratch (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson