Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OIFVeteran

Secession is not treason. Making war on them (the states) is. Lincoln is the only one who did that.


38 posted on 06/16/2020 5:11:38 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: FLT-bird
Actually it was treason. That's why they received a presidential pardon. In fact they were warned thirty years earlier by another President that secession was treason;

"The laws of the United States must be executed. I have no discretionary power on the subject-my duty is emphatically pronounced in the Constitution. Those who told you that you might peaceably prevent their execution, deceived you-they could not have been deceived themselves. They know that a forcible opposition could alone prevent the execution of the laws, and they know that such opposition must be repelled. Their object is disunion, hut be not deceived by names; disunion, by armed force, is TREASON."

Lincoln, on the other hand, was carrying out his constitutional duty to suppress insurrection. This duty is spelled out in the constitution and the means to do so was later delegated to the executive branch by congress in the militia acts of 1792 and 1795.

43 posted on 06/17/2020 5:27:16 AM PDT by OIFVeteran ( "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson