Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cuban leaf
I actually saw this as good news. You can only discriminate based on traits that affect their ability to to the job. That applies to race, sex, age, number of limbs, etc. I’m not really seeing the problem with this.

Agreed. In fact, rather than having to have new laws created to give extra special rights to the LGBTQXYZ community, the SC just said there's no need. They are protected against discrimination just like everybody else. That's a good thing. It does not, however, protect the LGBTQXYZers from being fired for their acts.

88 posted on 06/15/2020 10:05:58 AM PDT by Go Gordon (I gave my dog Grady a last name - Trump - because he loves tweets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Go Gordon

In fact, rather than having to have new laws created to give extra special rights to the LGBTQXYZ community, the SC just said there’s no need.


That is EXACTLY why I saw it as good news. It’s why I was also against the ERA. It singled out one sex over another. Preposterous.


89 posted on 06/15/2020 10:09:30 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson