This is an interesting discussion of originalism and how different "conservative" judges, including the two Trump-appointed justices and a couple of his potential nominees, see it differently when it comes to criminal justice cases.
1 posted on
06/13/2020 2:44:27 PM PDT by
TBP
To: TBP
Very interesting - thanks for posting!
2 posted on
06/13/2020 3:06:18 PM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: TBP
Vague law is no law.
Plain meaning of words is needed.
Majority got this correct, but for differing reasons.
Now if we would review 2nd Amd and Roe cases with plain language, we’d be getting somewhere.
3 posted on
06/13/2020 3:29:41 PM PDT by
Macoozie
(Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson