Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
I answered your question. Yes, there were some in the army that cared about abolition before Jan 1 1863. Not many, mind you, but a few did.

I think you accurately understand the percentages of opinions of the rank and file. I am still pointing out I was always referring to the movers and shakers, not the order followers. The top of the chain of command didn't care about abolishing slavery when they initiated their military engagements.

As you have pointed out so many time, the reason why, doesn’t matter. Those people were free to support abolition for whatever reason they chose.

Self Interest is self interest masquerading as altruism.

If they were against slavery for their own benefit, then it's really self interest, not opposition to slavery. These sort would defend it if they were making a buck off of it, sames as the Southerners were doing.

Caring about slavery is not caring about your own self interest.

132 posted on 06/14/2020 2:34:39 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Self Interest is self interest masquerading as altruism.

We are seceding from the Union for States rights and our independence.

The self interest, protection of the economic system that evolved in the deep South. nothing more nothing less.


133 posted on 06/14/2020 3:06:35 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson