To: knighthawk
This may be unpopular on this forum, but I wouldn’t lose a moment off sleep if this happened. Robert E. Lee made significant efforts to restore the union after the civil war but he also fought in a civil war on the losing side to preserve slaveholding as a right to be preserved by governments. Many of his generals were either worthless in battle (Bragg) or eager slaveholders (Benning). This ain’t the hill I’m dying on.
17 posted on
06/08/2020 11:46:20 PM PDT by
jz638
To: jz638
Many of his generals were either worthless in battle (Bragg) or eager slaveholders (Benning). Okay. I'll bite.
Washington was a slave holder too so I guess you are all for renaming Washington DC too yes?
How about renaming DC after Karl Marx?.
That sounds like a very nice name no?
This aint the hill Im dying on.
What hill will die for then?
The Joseph Stalin Hill or Fidel Castro Hill?
To: jz638
You forget those men served in the U.S. Military for more years than they were in the Confederacy, and several fought in the Mexican-American War. Robert E. Lee was Superintendent of West Point, and also fought in Mexico.
36 posted on
06/09/2020 12:54:38 AM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: jz638
This may be unpopular on this forum, but I wouldnt lose a moment off sleep if this happened. Robert E. Lee made significant efforts to restore the union after the civil war but he also fought in a civil war on the losing side to preserve slaveholding as a right to be preserved by governments. Many of his generals were either worthless in battle (Bragg) or eager slaveholders (Benning). This aint the hill Im dying on.
You shoild do some research before spouting off nonsense like that. Lee's resignation had nothing to do with attempting to preserve slaveholding, it was entirely under his honor to defend his native State from invasion.
To: jz638
They call people like you useful idiots.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson