Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
>> "Say each of those families had three children and suddenly you are up to 1.8 million people people drew direct benefit from slavery."<<

Families who own slaves is one reason I spoke above of "households". "Though it's undeniable that the Confederacy gave special status to slavery, records show that most Confederate soldiers came from households that didn't own slaves." States varied in how many families had slaves, but they were in the minority in every state. Wikipedia:

"One estimate is that in 1860, about 25% of households and 5% of the population (384,000 people) in the South owned at least one slave. An alternative estimate is that 36% of men lived in slaveholding families, and the percentage of men who had economic ties to slavery was much higher."

Still most didn't.

86 posted on 06/07/2020 6:48:29 PM PDT by GJones2 (Cultural purge of monuments and names of Confederates and former slaveholders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: GJones2
Still most didn't.

But still it's easier to understand how the South could rebel when 25% of its people derived direct benefit from slavery and countless more derived indirect benefit.

90 posted on 06/08/2020 4:25:09 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson