I completely agree things do not look good at this point in time, but I also know that at trial, evidence and testimony presented there can sometimes completely change our perception of a situation.
Going into his trial, George Zimmerman looked to me like he was probably guilty as sin. He clearly followed Martin, while armed, and Martin clearly died. Only at trial did we learn what the media had suppressed about Zimmerman only firing after he was put on his back with his head being repeatedly smashed into the concrete. Suddenly the outcome is very different and he appears less the aggressor and more a foolish man who had no other choice but to use deadly force to defend his life; admittedly because of the poor decisions he made leading up that point.
My point is just that while we see all this evidence right now pointing in one direction, we need to be willing to keep an open mind that there may yet still be facts we don’t know that could completely change how we perceive what took place.
This case is very different is that there is a video and at least one of the defendants is getting very talkative.