Again, you refuse to defend your insane qult
baggiepants, you've exposed yourself for the intellectually shallow qult qook that you are on FR.
That would be 'A' useful idiot. Again, not intellectual. Or is it your 'smart' phone acting the fool again?
and intellectually unable...
You keep using that word. Are you sure you're qualified?
Your twisting my words...
Its 'you're'. Not intellectual. Dumb phone malfunction? No. I'm not twisting your words. I'm responding to your repetitive mention of 12 year old girls. Once is an accident, twice is worrisome, three times is condemning.
If it walks like a perv....etc.
for the intellectually shallow
Again? Nope. The retarded don't walk the same path as the intellectual. I'm surprised you can spell it, to be honest.