I am not joking at your expense. I’m not joking at all. I am responding to what you wrote, perhaps more emphatically because of comments by others in the thread. Your comments are offensive and without foundation. Just like the entitled manipulative Canadian you seek to defend, your spurious attacks were noted. Good day to you & I hope we may better agree in future.
“He probably usually masturbates over the video he gets.”
“This is this guy’s “schtick”. He carries around dog treats and is practiced at videoing what he wants of an encounter he can arrange. He carries binoculars as an excuse for stalking white women. He doesn’t record his own threatening behavior.”
Geranimo
He was angry that the dog was going to disturb the pink-crested kneeling knob-gobblers...
dennisw
Screw the birdwatcher and the cream puff he rode in on!
I think you are mixing up responses. It happens, though we try to minimize it.
The actions and behavior of this man need to be looked at.
Video can be, and often is, one-sided.
The woman’s life has been destroyed, not his, and this is entirely due to his actions.
I am not Canadian, but I am over 55 years old and have lived all around the US. I have seen enough of life to know that people often push a good thing too far. He may have started with wanting to watch birds without being bothered by loose dogs. But he carried it too far. He ended up stalking people in the park with a camera and a bag of dog treats.