Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: poconopundit
Free Republic is a closed community. It doesn’t pretend to be open to the public for commenting. The large social media firms are operating quite different.@

Here’s the definition of who’s affected by the EO:

” Sec. 7. Definition. For purposes of this order, the term “online platform” means any website or application that allows users to create and share content or engage in social networking, or any general search engine.”

Don’t see how FR wiggles out of that.

66 posted on 05/28/2020 3:16:11 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo; poconopundit

Yep, the president better be careful with this issue...a lot of “non-abusing/non-censoring” sites may be caught up and declared “publishers” and incur liability for libel & slander, etc.. Sites like FR and the new “LBRY” YouTube alternative.

“LBRY” blockchain YouTube alternative: https://lbry.com

The presidents’ EO (pretty “general”/editorial in nature): https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/

“Platform vs. Publisher” issue info.:
https://www.do-op.com/2018/12/13/social-media-platforms-publishers/

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/social-media-platforms-or-publishers-rethinking-section-230/

https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html


104 posted on 05/28/2020 8:22:38 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson