Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Walker

Note post 27, 58, 69. He was threatening her, more accurately her dog, presuming his report is accurate. And his threat was pre recording.


74 posted on 05/26/2020 2:03:01 PM PDT by SJackson (Suppose you were an idiot, suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself, Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Enough.

The woman called the police and said, "I am being threatened by a man in the Bramble. Please send the cops immediately."

It's Clintonesque to twist that into, "Well, the guy did have a camera and he did have a dog treat and if she did have some neurosis of one kind or another she could really believe that a statement that anyone with an IQ of room temperature takes to mean that the woman's person is in danger of a man's physical attack really meant something else to her.

109 posted on 05/26/2020 2:21:58 PM PDT by Captain Walker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

I think that’s a reach. She was supposed to be controlling her animal on a leash. If the animal is running free than others have a right to take it outside the prohibited area which is what he asked her to do. Calling the dog to him with a treat would have most likely resulted in her leashing the dog and ending this issue.
Your assessment would be warranted if a stranger tried to attract a dog in an area where it was entitled to run free under your supervision. The stranger would have no right to intervene in those circumstances.


173 posted on 05/26/2020 2:45:09 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson