Posted on 05/25/2020 4:15:28 PM PDT by NoLibZone
What I said was those people don't get autopsied, so your point about lung damage tipping the ME off that it was Covid doesnt hold.
You said that before I said anything about autopsies.
Was that not meant to counter my point that the 100k figure is wrong and has been adjusted down? If not what did it mean?
Many who died of Covid at home early on, particularly in NY, werent classified as such.
We werent doing postmortem testing and certainly not doing autopsies.
We did see a spike in home deaths that cant be explained otherwise.
I said it to counter your statement that we werent at 100k deaths yet. We dont know exactly how many deaths we have but even if there are no uncounted home deaths well be well over 100k within days by anyones count so Im not sure what your point is.
That's true. But those who died at home are a vanishingly small number of people. Someone I trust implicitly told me so.
The rate for chronically ill elderly people who die in bed at home is probably vanishingly small. post #109
The overall autopsy rate in the US is well under 15%.
The rate for chronically ill elderly people who die in bed at home is probably vanishingly small.
Im clearly talking about the autopsy rate for old sick people who die at home.
Night.
The rate for chronically ill elderly people who die in bed at home is probably vanishingly small.
You really don't see the contradiction in logic in those two statements?
LOL Goodnight, Gracie.
One of these days; a few thousand Richard Dreyfuss types are going to remove their masks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.