Posted on 05/24/2020 7:41:01 AM PDT by L.A.Justice
What a vile woman.
Guilty.
Sixteen was many decades ago, but I still recall how I was. She would have been acceptable.
The movie "Summer of '42" comes to mind.
That was a long time ago.
Well there is a difference between legal, illegal and admissible. I am sure there are many loopholes with respect to expectation of privacy; i.e. bathroom and bedroom vs putting a camera in your OWN family room. Then you have to consider things like nanny-cams when it comes to protection of children.
________________________________________
Husband put the cameras in the common area...The article did not state if they were obvious or not...
Husband also put the recording device in the basement where the kid’s bedroom was located...
I guess cameras are OK since they are in the common area...
But, the recording device near the kid’s bedroom?
Used to be it was acceptable for older women to teach young men “the ropes” so to speak.
Those were the days, my friend.
L
C’mon! Its in Rhinelander, for cripes sake. Pickings are slim . . .
Then again, you’ve never been in Wisconsin.
Yeah, that’s why I said, if it was me, I would confirm my suspicions. Destroy bedroom footage, then set up cameras only in common areas and wait for them to slip up. It confirms guilt with the authorities without opening yourself up for charges. In fact, I would put a camera in plain view on the front porch with a sign in the yard that says “premises under surveillance” and not tell the cheating wife there were additional hidden cameras inside. LOL
That was also Jennifer O’Neal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.