OR maybe it means the virus isn’t as virulent as the “experts” thought.
OR maybe the social distancing measures Sweden mandated since the beginning (including no bar service at bars and restaurants) work just fine and you don’t need a lockdown. That’s the lesson I take from this: lockdowns don’t do much more than basic social distancing to stop the spread of COVID-19. If you can just have people who are sick stay home and people who don’t have any symptoms keep some distance and wash their hands, your hospitals don’t get overwhelmed like what happened in Italy.
Sweden’s death rate would be much lower if they’d made any effort to protect the vulnerable (particularly those in nursing homes).
RE: OR maybe it means the virus isn’t as virulent as the “experts” thought.
That was one of the thoughts that came to my mind.
Antibodies means that the person has been infected and his body has more or less, fought the disease, but why are there less than 10% infections when there is no lockdown?
Could that not mean that the virus is not as infectious as we originally feared?