Posted on 05/21/2020 2:06:36 PM PDT by PresidentFelon
This collection of leading legal experts discusses a range of federal crimes that apply to the conduct of President Donald Trump, based on the evidence produced by the House of Representatives impeachment inquiry. These crimes include all of the federal offences listed in the Chapter headings, except for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In that Chapter, the author concludes that the impeachment inquiry did not examine the relevant evidence for one of the elements of the crime, although a lot of that evidence has arisen in investigative reports by journalists. The final Chapter includes an important federal law that does not trigger criminal liability, but does implicate the Presidents constitutional obligation to ensure the laws are faithfully executed. Close readers will also notice some nuances in the authors analyses. Compare for example Barbara McQuades and Randall Eliasons discussion of whether a White House visit for a head of state counts as an official act for the purposes of bribery and honest services fraud. Finally, a point worth underscoring: as Andrew Weissmann explains in the Introduction, impeachable offenses need not be criminal in nature, and not all crimes are impeachable offences. Members of Congress certainly do not need to conclude that the President committed a crime for impeachment, conviction, and removal. Nevertheless, the fact that these leading experts reach the conclusion that several federal crimes apply to President Trumps conduct involving Ukraine is an important consideration for the annals of history and for the historic decision Congress now faces.
(Excerpt) Read more at justsecurity.org ...
Ted Stevens, Arthur Adelman, Enron
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.