[Political Junkie Too]

I was responding to the poster who said that the appellate court could have rejected the writ of mandamus because there were still other remedies to pursue (i.e., the motion to reconsider), as it did in another case that the poster cited.

My point was, why would the appellate court prolong the process knowing that Sullivan's goal was to prolong the process?

-PJ

[Hostage]

You’re right. The appeals court is obviously not amused at what Sullivan has done. In fact, as I see it the whole of the legal universe is collectively expressing a bug “Huh?”.