Replies

The dismissal request has been highly controversial. Former prosecutors say it smacked of favoritism toward an ally of Trump, and some have specifically accused Attorney General William Barr of manipulating the justice system to help the president.

Bias. I would call it snide. Many people have commented favorably, including Dershowitz and Turley, but the author of this article chooses to go with unnamed "former prosecutors." Maybe the ones who have had to leave?

"Months later, Flynn dismissed his legal team and hired Powell, a vocal Mueller critic, who soon began efforts to undo the criminal case. Powell accused prosecutors of withholding exculpatory information from Flynn, a claim that the Justice Department for months repeatedly denied. The Justice Department’s request this month to dismiss the charge against Flynn was signed by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for D.C. at the time, and not by any of the prosecutors who had handled Flynn’s case up to that point."

This commentary is attempting to slight the motion to dismiss because it wasn't signed by the original dishonest, thug prosecutors. Notice that the writer fails to mention that they were caught red handed NOT providing all of the evidence to Flynn's attorneys.

"The dismissal request has been highly controversial. Former prosecutors say it smacked of favoritism toward an ally of Trump, and some have specifically accused Attorney General William Barr of manipulating the justice system to help the president. Trump has frequently criticized the case against Flynn."

Total one hundred percent crapola commentary designed once again to slight the dismissal and taint it as something done by Trump and his "orange Man Bad" machine.

This article is aimed at the ignorant masses currently under the mind control of the deep state media who will take the "hints" planted in the commentary and spread it as gospel on the streets. That's all this article is. Mind control.