[SeekAndFind]

RE: RESULTS:

HCQ group: 0 deaths
Non-HCQ group: 9 deaths

_____________________________________

VERY VAGUE REPORT.

1) Deaths from what? The report did not say. Were all these “deaths” a result of Covid-19?

2) It also said that some of those who took HCQ contracted Covid-19 with “mild attack” <-— what does it even mean? This simply tells us that the protective ability of HCQ against Covid-19 is not 100%.

3) The report did not mention HOW MANY WERE INFECTED in the group NOT taking HCQ vs. those taking it.

This is really a useless report.

[arthurus]

And if it is not 100% then it is criminal to use it. Instead we should use R-evir which has a scientifically tested ability to shorten recovery time an average of 4 days for those who survive. It does not reduce the death rate any per cent but that is so trivial.

[Kazan]

Deaths from what?

From Covid-19. Click on the link to the Times of India article.

[freefdny]

Zero deaths out of the 4500 who took HCQ doesn’t sound vague at all to me. The efficacy in preventing death in this study is also 100%. That doesn’t seem useless to me.

[Karl Spooner]

What would you choose to do, be in the group A that took it and had no deaths, or play it safe and be in group B that had 9 deaths?