Wikipedia Founder Says the Project Has Abandoned Neutrality Policy, is ‘Badly Biased’

District Herald ^ | 5-19-20

[Truthoverpower]

For example just pick some up secure battle from 1115 AD and some OBSCURE part of Europe and IT WILL have lots of details about it

[Tunehead54]

"Wikipedia is a fine resource if you want to know who was the drummer for Journey, or what are all the books in the Valdemar series. Anything remotely political or religious - forget it."

---

+100 that I've convinced. ;-)

[Prolixus]

Yes, there are good entries in Wikipedia but every entry is in danger of being edited into Democrat Party/Globalist propaganda.

O'Sullivan's Law
"... any organization or enterprise that is not expressly right wing will become left wing over time."

Wikpedia also has an entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_O%27Sullivan_(columnist)#O'Sullivan's_first_law

[The Duke]

I never really trusted Wiki as a source, after learning how it operates, it's a propaganda machine.

Why limit to Wikipedia? Are our textbooks not filled with propoganda? Our classrooms?

I pretty much trust Wikipedia for non-political information, which is important to me. For political info I trust my own two eyes, and I "follow the money".