Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind
FORTRAN has nothing to do with any problem. This author is nuts.
completely agree. it's another one of those senseless technology/vendor based religious wars (apple! PC! oracle DB !! MSSQL!! WINDOWS!! LINUX!!), and the dipsh*t author wants to poke holes in his choice of tools. you had an idea the article was going to go that way when the first two paragraphs were about how great he was.

ferguson lost the handle on his overall design, or his algorithm sucked to begin with, or he never understood the problem, or maybe he's just a crappy programmer.

but that the dumbest damn thing I've read in quite some time.

30 posted on 05/20/2020 10:45:53 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: JohnBrowdie; ConservativeMind

OK I agree, the language itself isn’t the problem. It’s just odd to see FORTRAN being used these days. I am pretty sure a model could be developed using Microsoft Excel functions that would be just as good. Or any other language or software.

I also tend to agree, the integrity of the modeler is paramount. If you tweak it constantly because the results don’t fit your thesis then that is not scientific. And in the end, when they started this modeling, they really didn’t know all that much about disease spread, susceptibility... hell we didn’t even have many tests. There was no way a model could predict things it didn’t and couldn’t factor.


49 posted on 05/20/2020 11:25:15 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson