To: DiogenesLamp
They most certainly did. You just don't like the fact that they did because you don't like the outcome.
No, they didn't. They did not see the victim commit any felony. They had no right to attempt any arrest of him. The rest of your words add nothing of substance.
To: AnotherUnixGeek
No, they didn't. They did not see the victim commit any felony. It is unnecessary to see the ASSAILANT, not "victim", commit any felony. All that is required is a reasonable suspicion of a crime.
Stop trying to move the goalposts and stop believing everyone is dumb enough to accept your changes to what the law actually is.
106 posted on
05/22/2020 10:28:10 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson