Jury's don't arrest people. Cops and Citizens do, and they don't decide guilt they just decide "suspicion."
Suspicion of a crime is all that is necessary.
Cops can't carry around a Jury in their back pocket. Courts decide "facts", Cops grab "suspects."
The victim rushing him caused him not to shoot,
Very bad plan for anyone rushing a man with a shotgun. That he wasn't killed instantly was only because the man holding the shotgun didn't want to kill him.
The problem here isn't English comprehension - the problem is the logical contortions needed to defend this shooting.
Defending the shooting is logical and clear cut. Trying to *FORCE* it to be a "crime", requires all sorts of logical and factual contortions.
You don't see how ridiculous it is because your initial gut reaction is that two "Bubba's" should not be trying to arrest a black guy, and certainly shouldn't be using guns.
But you were not in that situation, and anyone as weak as those two men would stand no chance against a young man like Arbery without a weapon.
You don't have a realistic view of what they were facing. You make these snap judgements from the comfort of your chair, and don't really consider how you would have behaved were you in their situation.
President Eisenhower once said "Farming is easy if your plow is a pencil and the fields are a thousand miles away."