He did do this. He ordered Jeff Jensen, a United States Attorney and a former FBI agent, to review the case. Jensen is the one who wrote the motion to dismiss.
I will concede that it should have happened long ago, but in the end it happened, he ordered it, and he acted on the findings.
It was too slow for my liking also, but the whole Flynn case has been strange from the outset given that he pled guilty long ago and was awaiting sentencing for an eternity.
I get it. The glass half empty side of me says this should have been done immediately. However, the glass half full side says it was done. It was a huge blow to the crown jewel of the Mueller probe. Today Barr took a grade A dump all over the whole thing.
Barr has the goods. The left will howl and gnash their teeth, but he 1) asserted that he is not partisan and 2) he basically promised us that he will back up his words with what he knows, just as DOJ did with the motion to dismiss the Flynn case.
Thanks for the enlightenment. So which came first? Sidney Powell and the evidence against the DOJ, or Jensen with his motion to dismiss? Seems without Sidney humiliating the DOJ, there would be no motion to dismiss, which to me just tells me Barr didnt do squat for 2 years.