I think vaccines should be a personal decision.
Those that want it can get it. And they are protected.
Those that don’t can skip it. However, the insurance companies should have the right to not cover the medical costs of those that opt out.
Should insurance cover people who get the vaccine and then have a worse case of the virus when they get exposed? This is happened with coronaviruses.
Not a fan of freedom, are you?
Injecting poison into your body for a little bug with a 99.5% survival rate is colossal stupidity.
The chances of you getting the bug are incredibly low. But, if you did, there’s always the Hydroxychloroquine cocktail.
THAT is the answer, not injecting a hastily produced vaccine into your bland destroying your health.
Anyone who believes that Americans should be forced to take the poison are communists. Period.
aquila48 wrote: “However, the insurance companies should have the right to not cover the medical costs of those that opt out.”
Excellent idea. You don’t have insurance coverage if you don’t get the vaccine. Very much like the US Army that required you to get the flu shots. If you didn’t and you got the flu, it was considered “Not In The Line of Duty”. No sick leave and you paid, out of pocket, for your treatment.
Those that don’t can skip it. However, the insurance companies should have the right to not cover the medical costs of those that opt out.
Sure. As long as the insurance companies have the right to opt out of paying for treatment for the lifelong side effects of vaccinations, which are much more costly than treating a fever and a rash that lasts for a couple of days. Oh, and then they will never have to be treated for that particular illness again, unlike the vaccinated who’s immunity is temporary and contrary to your false premise NOT guaranteed.