Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Constitution Requires Judge Emmet Sullivan’s Lawless Amicus Order Against Michael Flynn Be Overturned
The Federalist ^ | May 14, 2020 | Margot Cleveland

Posted on 05/14/2020 6:09:37 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: billorites

Has this ruling even been appealed yet?


41 posted on 05/14/2020 7:35:16 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Yes Sullivan might have some discretion here, but the way he's going about it is absurd. The whole thing about a perjury charge for a false guilty plea smacks of coercion in an effort to stop Flynn from asserting his innocence. That would stop any defendant in the future from trying to change a plea, which is an allowed request. Bringing in third parties, in effect to prosecute. And the third party is obviously a surrogate for the judge's own angry feelings. Sullivan should have simply ruled. He can call the parties in, yell at them and make his decisions. He's obviously angry and acting way out of the judicial 📦.
42 posted on 05/14/2020 7:39:37 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
They were monitoring Flynn, not Kislyak.

They may have been monitoring Flynn but only a fool would think they weren't monitoring Kislyak.

43 posted on 05/14/2020 7:40:17 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
You’re discussing Russian sanctions. Maybe they should take an interest in YOU!!!!

You forgot the part about an agent of the Russian government.

You an ambassador?

44 posted on 05/14/2020 7:42:26 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DOC44
WOW... I must be on the wrong board.

Sorry. Didn't mean to interrupt the echo.

45 posted on 05/14/2020 7:43:28 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Fokker decision was a 2016 decision from the D.C. Circuit Court and, as such, establishes “mandatory precedent,” i.e., precedent that must be followed, by all D.C. district court judges—including Judge Sullivan.

If we truly had an impartial Justice System, when Flynn Appeals this decision, the Appeals Court would hold Judge Sullivan in Contempt of Court and JAIL HIM for 30 days.
46 posted on 05/14/2020 7:49:05 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

How do I know you aren’t an agent of the Russian government. Maybe you need to be unmasked.

Right now you are acting as an agent of the deep state.

Why are you posting on Free Republic, eh comrade?


47 posted on 05/14/2020 7:54:13 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
“legit and unremarkable”

Doesn't happen 30,000 times in a year, unless the unmaskers are crooks trying to keep their a$$e$ out of prison.

48 posted on 05/14/2020 7:56:27 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The point is that they knew Kyslyak was talking to Flynn because they were monitoring Flynn. HE WAS NOT UNMASKED! They were spying on Flynn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


49 posted on 05/14/2020 7:56:58 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal; semimojo
Doesn't happen 30,000 times in a year, unless the unmaskers are crooks trying to keep their a$$e$ out of prison.

Indeed.

50 posted on 05/14/2020 8:06:00 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth
More likely he is a deep stater. He has trashed his own reputation here, broken the law, and subjected himself to a very serious ethics complaint. No way is this some kind of normal bias. My guess that the Obama deep state fears like everything that their crimes will be further exposed, especially if Flynn gets back into Trump admin, or even gets to advise from the sidelines.
51 posted on 05/14/2020 8:08:27 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
The unmasking was legit and unremarkable. It happens thousands of times each year.

I do not think that is correct. It has been reported to have ramped up to include the Trump campaign in large numbers, far beyond what might be considered ordinary.

The unmasking of political opponents is extremely unusual, and beyond the pale.

52 posted on 05/14/2020 8:36:19 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth
Judge Sullivan is going senile. There is clearly something wrong with him. Its frightening the partisan evil going after Flynn, the left is really beginning to scare me.

What he is doing is perfectly logical, if you accept the assumption that he is doing it for partisan political advantage.

53 posted on 05/14/2020 8:40:14 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I agree -- Sullivan is being ridiculous. The "but he admitted he was a liar" argument, which the left is citing repeatedly for proof that Flynn was truly guilty, ignores the element of coercion. A coerced guilty plea is something the left has readily discounted when you have someone falsely convicted of other crimes to which they pled guilty. They don't claim "perjury" or " but "he admitted it" in those cases, so why isn't it valid in Flynn's?

Never mind -- I already know the answer.

54 posted on 05/14/2020 8:53:20 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Most folks don’t realize how arrogant and obnoxious many judges are. Also lazy and ill informed. He’s been in that position for like 35 years, no one can fire him. They are bound mostly by their own character or lack thereof.

Many of them are obnoxious to the point of insanity.

Not exaggerating. They harass, they misbehave, they are corrupt, the list goes on.

If someone surveilled THEIR phone calls there would be mass bribery and corruption charges resulting.


55 posted on 05/14/2020 9:51:43 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I do not think that is correct. It has been reported to have ramped up to include the Trump campaign in large numbers, far beyond what might be considered ordinary.

NSA started releasing these numbers in 2015. In the 12 months ending August 2015 there were 9,217 unmasked. In CY17 there were 9,529 and in CY18 there were 16,721.

I think 2019 was around 10K.

Statistical Transparency Report Regarding the Use of National Security Authorities

The unmasking of political opponents is extremely unusual, and beyond the pale.

How do you know they're your political opponents until they're unmasked, and if you know who they are why bother asking for them to be unmasked?

56 posted on 05/14/2020 10:48:53 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Bullsquirt. That is the conspirators story. They were innocently monitoring Kislyak when they happened upon Flynn. And they innocently needed to know who he was talking to.

It was not innocent. It was a targeted operation and Flynn was the target, not Kislyak.


57 posted on 05/14/2020 11:20:08 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Was Sullivan forced to commit this legal atrocity? I really doubt he came up with this himself.


58 posted on 05/14/2020 11:31:54 AM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
What on earth is an OUTSIDE U. S. Attorney?

He was the attorney assigned by Barr to get to the bottom of all this. He was outside of the Flynn prosecution team and uncovered all the bad actors.

59 posted on 05/14/2020 11:44:42 AM PDT by usurper ( version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
As we have multiple high-ranking members of the Obama administration doing the unmasking, It would appear knowledge that it was Flynn, was very likely to be spread about in the upper echelons.

As for why, perhaps to show - "member of the club" status (I looked at it too, my status is as high as yours"), or to keep story lines straight, or at the urging of other top ranking members, to be at equal risk, multiple possibilities.

60 posted on 05/14/2020 12:29:33 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson