Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: R0CK3T

Please answer me this: Why would multiple people request the unmasking. Surely Biden knew it was Michael Flynn before January 17th. Help me out.


112 posted on 05/13/2020 3:06:26 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: cornfedcowboy

“Please answer me this: Why would multiple people request the unmasking. Surely Biden knew it was Michael Flynn before January 17th. Help me out”

He forgot? got confused? Wasn’t that the same day Mustachioed Rice sent (inaugreation day) that last second CYA email to herself in regards to Odunga’s meeting on Jan. 5th. Hummmm very interesting.


115 posted on 05/13/2020 3:16:03 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: cornfedcowboy

Flynn and Kushner were at the time trying to head off Susan Powers and Kerry’s plans with UN resolution 2334


135 posted on 05/13/2020 4:56:19 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: cornfedcowboy

The process by which unmasking must be done was explained by Admiral Rogers in an interview after he retired. For each unmasking asked of Flynn, needless if that was all they were asking for— this group of a@@clowns got around the strict rules with the “hop and skip” method for surveilling ANYONE Flynn was talking to, and then who those people were talking to-— waaaaaay beyond the Kislyak call, and not the 33 other foreign ambassadors he called. Call it “multilevel” unmasking bypassing the strict rules of Federal laws (which, btw liberal dems insisted on for civil rights— what irony)

The “hop and skip” to other individuals from the multiple requests for the same unmasking-— is completely illegal— major security breach of NSA intercepts— and is spelled out in the enabling legislation created to protect individual privacy.

That is the crux of the importance of the exposure of multiple unmasking requesters— the Queen of them in sheer numbers was Samantha Power (who tried say someone had “used her name by hacking it”— never happened, she gladly helped build the entire surveillance operation of thousands of Americans). This is the “obama” apparatus which that idiot Maxine Waters bragged about repeatedly. It is obamaumao’s STASI like surveil, which in Flynn’s case was decided to remove him— because Flynn was set to expose all of this abuse,political surveillance, and because he was advocating AUDITing several 3 letter intel agencies. He had to be taken down, fired— whatever.

The requests must be in writing. And the request is documented with reasons for the request. The written requests will be declassified, and all hell will break loose for the ones who are not to be indicted, and exposing them to the public. Durham has all the other request letters— they are evidence no one ever thought would be revealed in their “operation”.


143 posted on 05/13/2020 6:52:32 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: cornfedcowboy
Please answer me this: Why would multiple people request the unmasking. Surely Biden knew it was Michael Flynn before January 17th. Help me out.

Many people read a conversation with Flynn's name blanked out and many of them asked for the name.

156 posted on 05/14/2020 1:54:05 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson