I know exactly what I post.
Summary: Many here say that we shouldn’t believe the homeowner when he says nothing was stolen. We are told that he’s motivated to lie because he has had death threats. Then we are told that we know he’s had death threats, because he says so...and, on that, we should believe him.
It’s about consistency in logic, not about what I personally know.
Well, I know at as much as I did before I asked. Using such logic as yours or that akin to it, the dynamic father and son have got themselves 30 years to life. Their reasoning and powers of deduction, Which no one but the jail house lawyers agree with is going to get them a 30 year to life stint with the Georgia Department of Corrections. Along with the possibility of some Federal Time.The GIB certainly did not agree with their line of reasoning. And neither die the Attorney General of Georgia. This fact alone does not bode well for them.
You left out the alternative explanation that he doesn't actually know what was stolen because it wasn't his stuff that was stolen. A missing hammer more likely belonged to a worker, not the owner.
Capiche?
So does anyone know if the owner had previously reported stolen items? What's this $2,500.00 in fishing gear I keep hearing about? Who's property was that? Also, how the hell do you have "fishing gear" worth $2,500.00 dollars?