Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2020 6:33:07 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
The Michael Flynn case will soon be over.

That is a fact not in evidence.

2 posted on 05/13/2020 6:34:35 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

later


3 posted on 05/13/2020 6:35:45 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Just Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A good summary for those who say “This was just what the FBI does all the time.”


4 posted on 05/13/2020 6:38:01 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“In accordance with usual FBI practice, the interview was not recorded. “

THIS IS CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.


5 posted on 05/13/2020 6:39:14 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
under enormous pressure from Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller, pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI without ever reading what Pientka originally wrote about the interview.

Much about the Flynn case still puzzles me, including Flynn’s thought process. He’s been in DC for many years, especially in the “intelligence community.” He already had enemies and was forced to retire from the Obama Admin in 2012. He should quite understand the viciousness of the swamp, no? He was how at the highest levels of the Trump Admin - couldn’t he imagine that he, and others, would be targeted by the Deep State? Why did he plead guilty, when he knew he did no wrong? What exactly was he threatened with?

Also, why on God’s green earth did he hire Eric Holder’s firm to defend him? They screwed him over a second time.

7 posted on 05/13/2020 6:42:22 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

My take is quite different than a lot of those who see Judge Sullivan’s minute order, inviting amici briefs, as spelling trouble for General Flynn. To understand where Judge Sullivan is coming from you have to understand where he’s been with regard to DOJ prosecutorial misconduct and corruption. The Flynn case is eerily similar to the Senator Ted Stevens prosecution. Both the Stevens and Flynn cases were handled by Judge Sullivan and both have now resulted in Justice filing a MTD due to prosecutorial misconduct. In Stevens, Judge Sullivan agreed that the misconduct was so egregious he held the prosecutors in civil contempt and appointed a court master to examine into the misconduct. One prosecutor killed himself before it was all over. He ultimately dismissed the Stevens case and civil contempt charges, likely thinking he had sent a sobering message to the DOJ to never commit fraud in the courtroom again. Unfortunately, the Flynn case only proves he was dead wrong and things only got worse. Keep in mind both Stevens and Flynn happened on Obozo’s watch. What can Judge Sullivan do now to address the deepening fraud and corruption in DOJ? As in Stevens, he certainly isn’t going to deny the MTD but he also certainly knows that the Justice Department has a systemic problem of the first order and is rotten to the core. The question is what is the remedy to straighten out a Justice Department whose corruption is evidenced by 2000 arrogant former employees being so brazen as to publicly chastise AG Barr over his condemning outlandish prosecutorial misconduct? This is not at all a question with an easy answer. That’s what is on the mind of Judge Sullivan.


9 posted on 05/13/2020 6:47:34 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“In the Flynn case, nothing worked as it should have. Nothing.”

Depends on whether you’re looking at it as a D’rat/MSM minion or as a patriot.


13 posted on 05/13/2020 7:06:19 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Byron states that FBI agents have 5 days following an interview to file the FD-302. The Flynn interview was held on January 24, 2017. So, Byron in flat-out wrong when he states the FD-302 was due on February 10, 2017.

Of course, five days after January 24th would be January 29th, NOT February 10th, as York states, which is more than TWO WEEKS after the interview.


19 posted on 05/13/2020 7:54:45 AM PDT by RightGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


21 posted on 05/13/2020 9:23:18 AM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
We know for a fact that there was an original 302 due to the testimony that Comey gave under oath, that the day after the interview, the agents conferred with him, presented the 302 and their notes, and it was entered into the record.

The huge question is...where is that original 302 submitted officially the DAY AFTER THE INTERVIEW?

All the 302 forms we have seen have been heavily edited and massaged by both scumbag Strzok and his lovebird Page over a period of months.

This article at RealClearInvestigations.com is a great overview: New Red Flags Emerging From FBI's Handling of Michael Flynn's Case by Mark Hemingway

22 posted on 05/13/2020 11:23:12 AM PDT by rlmorel (The Coronavirus itself will not burn down humanity. But we may burn ourselves down to be rid of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson