Skip to comments.
Flynn judge wrong to allow anti-Trump former Watergate prosecutors to interfere in case
Fox News ^
| May 12 2020
| Gregg Jarrett
Posted on 05/13/2020 2:50:15 AM PDT by knighthawk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: knighthawk
They must be geriatric by now.
41
posted on
05/13/2020 7:24:16 AM PDT
by
myerson
To: Ann Archy
Judges aren’t suppose to be party adherents. They should act on the law.
Judge Sullivan is opening the case to public third party comment which IMHO does not add anything to the law and is not applicable under it.
42
posted on
05/13/2020 7:41:06 AM PDT
by
romanesq
(Flubro, from the people who brought you the stupidity of grifters & the letter Q)
To: Ann Archy
43
posted on
05/13/2020 8:36:44 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: knighthawk
44
posted on
05/13/2020 12:37:54 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Some of these people, I met them -- zero interest, Okay? Like zero." -- Donald J. Trump)
To: Robert357
There is an almost empty spool of 1000 foot rope at this time. I think they have enough.
45
posted on
05/13/2020 12:40:46 PM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
( #wwg1wga #gin&tonic #Godwins)
To: AndyJackson
Former prosecutors have no standing. Does Flynn’s lawyer get to say, “Exception, your honor!” - and appeal this joke of a decision? How would that work?
46
posted on
05/13/2020 2:30:30 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson