According to Andy McCarthy, it would be difficult for Sullivan to proceed to sentencing without the support of the prosecution, thus leaving the only option of a dismissal.
I still don’t trust this creep.
The Lawfare teams’ actions are of concern to me. These groups need a big tell-all exposure.
Discussion of ‘options’ by McCarthy and whoever else is not pertinent other than to echo the disbelief, denial, shock, and confusion.
A key analysis will focus on the Gag Order.
Flynn, once able to speak, can reveal facts and testimony that lead to or support indictments presumably leading a path to Obama.
The key then is to keep the Gag Order in place as long as possible. That translates to keeping the time to a ruling of dismissal extended out as far as possible.
Asking, receiving, reviewing thousands of amici might buy six months of delay removing a Flynn factor in the election.
The emergency appeal by the General Flynn’s attorney Sydney Powell to the DC Court of Appeals should sail through if I am correct that the composition of that court has been revamped by the Administration. Correct me if I am wrong here.
If the appeal is successful as expected. it would seem Sullivan must dismiss.
A question to ponder is whether Sullivan can leave the Gag Order in place after dismissal without delay.
In a similar kangeroo court involving Dr. Judy Mikovits, charges were dropped and a Gag order was left in place.
Someone with legal experience, please chime in.