Posted on 05/12/2020 1:24:09 PM PDT by eyeamok
Good, now we should nail Soros and company to the wall on our southern border and leave their corpses for the buzzards.
Not really sure how much I’m “not being serious” ... though I’m certainly not being literal and speaking for effect.
Also, those with no provable something to gain should be those MOST punished ... not the least. Those able to press the ideology behind open borders and population replacements are worse than people merely getting their proverbial 30 pieces of silver.
“and THEREFORE speaking for effect”
...the last edit you do is one edit too few....
Isn’t Prince Harry here for financial gain so they can support themselves?
For those who can stay awake, here’s the actual decision:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-67_n6io.pdf
Actually now would be the time to nail Soros before the ink on this decision dries.
… I think the wimmin scrotus are supposed to be called scrota (singular) or scrotae (plural).
Bringing back nightmares of Latin conjugation drills
Soros needs to be prosecuted. He brought in 10’s of thousands of Central Americans. He can be deported with all of them.
Isn't that the 2nd unanimous decision within like a week of each other? I think the previous one was on the New Jersey "bridgegate" case. I must be having flashbacks. 8>)
Aside from the Constitution forbidding ex post facto laws we might be able to do that. What he MIGHT be caught on is if deeds done while this statute was locked up in the courts could be gone after.
Making it illegal to advocate open borders would violate 1A.
The law is against specific people taking specific action for a specific alien beneficiary.
Prince Harry is here illegally?
... Those are declensions, not conjugations. Conjugations are for verbs.
Latin was the only class in HS I came dangerously close to failing
I notice the absence of FOR POLITICAL GAIN.
That is where most of the incentive for the encouragement for illegal aliens to come to the United States actually lies IMO.
If that verbiage was in the law most of the Democrat Party would be in legal jeopardy. And so would a sizable portion of the Republican Party.
Yes, most of the sanctuary government leadership should be indicted under this law, as I see it.
For those who can stay awake, here’s the actual decision:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-67_n6io.pdf
---- and Ginsburg wrote it. The Ninth Circus didn't get their hand slapped. They got smacked upside the head.
I think you should look up the definitions for advocate versus instigate, and aide & abett. Talk all you want but supply support, money, transportation, and false documents etc. is not free speech. IMO
The period behind bars doubles if he or she acted “for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain.”
I notice the absence of FOR POLITICAL GAIN.
Go after the donors of the rats that are privately profiting from this abuse and sue them into poverty.
Works great against republicans, but they lack a spine and testicles to follow up on the same standards.
Supreme Court should rule on the illegal Obama-era H4EAD executive order that allows Indian spouses to take American jobs (it’s 96% Indians)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.