Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We're going to hear a lot more whining from the blue states. Read the whole article for the holes in their arguments.
1 posted on 05/10/2020 3:53:32 PM PDT by RightGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightGeek

We need to see more articles about the ‘donor state’ hoax.

This is a good start.


2 posted on 05/10/2020 4:07:20 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

A “progressive” tax code’s a bitch, ain’t it libtards, hahaha!


3 posted on 05/10/2020 4:13:55 PM PDT by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

More liberal reasons for a massive federal bailout


4 posted on 05/10/2020 4:18:26 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

This misses a huge area of federal spending. Although I haven’t been able to find the specific amount, as best I can tell, the largest area of federal outlays is redeeming government bonds. These payments go to where people buy government bonds. In the most usual comparison I’ve seen, taxes versus outlays, the money people pay for government bonds are not counted, because it’s not a tax. The money to redeem the bonds is an outlay, so that counts.

This creates the illusion that people who buy government bonds are a pure drain on the system. Actually, by lending the government money, they are helping to hold the roof up.

Since this is, as far as I can tell, the largest part of government expenditures, getting this backwards distorts any study of who is supporting the government, and who is draining it. I would not trust any comparison unless I see some indication that they got government bonds right.


5 posted on 05/10/2020 5:11:25 PM PDT by Keb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

BUMP


6 posted on 05/10/2020 5:34:05 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

Well, the headline is true, they do donate a lot to illegal aliens and planned parenthood.


7 posted on 05/10/2020 5:36:38 PM PDT by fish hawk (MACA Make America Christian Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

One argument against New York’s claim is overlooked. Just as New York did not want to be morally sullied by charitable help from Samaritan’s Purse because of its objectionable religious views, surely New York does not want to sullied by accepting cash from states where such views are common and accepted.


8 posted on 05/10/2020 7:09:36 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightGeek

New York is a “donor” state insofar as its citizens take their retirement income and move elsewhere.....

This makes it more of a non recipient rather than donor state.

State and local taxes which are outrageous in NY, are a reason why they’re a donor state. People need higher salaries to cover their taxes, and the cost of living that taxes factor into. Higher salaries = higher federal taxes.


9 posted on 05/10/2020 9:45:03 PM PDT by Ceebass (A man riding by on a galloping horse wouldn't notice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson