Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chajin
It would have been "interpreted" by SCOTUS at some point to allow the biases

At the time I would have thought that men would organize to demand change based on the ERA, but four decades of watching men spend billions a year on prostitution and next to nothing fighting for their rights has answered that.

because as Orwell put it, all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

The animals that are willing to fight for their equal rights are definitely more equal than those that won't.

And none of this changes the fact that the STOP ERA movement was intended to preserve those biases.

16 posted on 05/10/2020 3:48:34 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Prayers for our country and President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: TwelveOfTwenty

The ERA would never have been interpreted to simply eliminate women’s “privileges”. It would have been interpreted, and was intended by its supporters, to enshrine feminist dogma into the Constitution.


17 posted on 05/10/2020 4:01:28 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson