Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintintin
The break-even point is somewhere around 78 years of age. If you take Social Security early, you are ahead of the game until you hit 78. After that, you are better off financially if you had waited.

For me, it was a no-brainer. I took Social Security as soon as possible, at 62. Because:

1. I don’t know if I’ll make it to 78.
2. I’ll be spending more money now - when I’m younger - than when I’m older.

Of course I might have a different opinion when I’m 95. We’ll see.

6 posted on 05/09/2020 1:33:43 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right
"The break-even point is somewhere around 78 years of age. If you take Social Security early, you are ahead of the game until you hit 78."

My math came to about 73 if I had waited for full repayment. Anyway, I suggest to anyone over 62 and not working to get their contributions back soonest. It's your money. However, be aware you have to pay yearly taxes on SS payments as yearly income. Not much, but it sucks.

18 posted on 05/09/2020 2:03:01 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Also LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

“Of course I might have a different opinion when I’m 95.”

if you make it to 95, it really won’t matter ...


38 posted on 05/09/2020 3:11:28 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson