To: rintintin
The break-even point is somewhere around 78 years of age. If you take Social Security early, you are ahead of the game until you hit 78. After that, you are better off financially if you had waited.
For me, it was a no-brainer. I took Social Security as soon as possible, at 62. Because:
1. I dont know if Ill make it to 78.
2. Ill be spending more money now - when Im younger - than when Im older.
Of course I might have a different opinion when Im 95. Well see.
6 posted on
05/09/2020 1:33:43 PM PDT by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: Leaning Right
"The break-even point is somewhere around 78 years of age. If you take Social Security early, you are ahead of the game until you hit 78."
My math came to about 73 if I had waited for full repayment. Anyway, I suggest to anyone over 62 and not working to get their contributions back soonest. It's your money. However, be aware you have to pay yearly taxes on SS payments as yearly income. Not much, but it sucks.
18 posted on
05/09/2020 2:03:01 PM PDT by
A Navy Vet
(I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Also LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
To: Leaning Right
“Of course I might have a different opinion when Im 95.”
if you make it to 95, it really won’t matter ...
38 posted on
05/09/2020 3:11:28 PM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson