Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner

No. The dismissal is “with prejudice” (cannot refile).


219 posted on 05/07/2020 2:11:12 PM PDT by shalom aleichem (Durham and Barr! *hit or get off the pot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: shalom aleichem
It is high time for you to choose a new tagline...

TXnMA    
  

230 posted on 05/07/2020 2:32:15 PM PDT by TXnMA (Anagram: "PANDEMIC --> DEM PANIC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: shalom aleichem
No. The dismissal is “with prejudice” (cannot refile). Judge's dismiss. With or without prejudice, as they see fit. What happened today was not the act of the Judge in this case. It was, rather, an act of the prosecution. The prosecution filed a motion.

What action the Judge takes on the motion remains to be seen. It's about 99.9% for sure he will accept it. And then the case will be over.

No dismissal has taken place yet, and whether accepting the Prosecutions motion to end the case is some how involved the case being dismissed with prejudice -- that hasn't played out yet.

252 posted on 05/07/2020 3:35:07 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson