Posted on 05/02/2020 4:23:17 PM PDT by fwdude
The newest case against Jack Phillips, the infamous owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, cannot be dismissed, a Colorado district court decided Wednesday. Autumn Scardina, a transgender woman, filed a complaint against Phillips in 2017 with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, unsuccessfully. Scardina filed the suit after Phillips declined, due to his religious beliefs, to make a cake celebrating the transition Scardina made from male to female.
Scardina, an attorney, then filed a new lawsuit in state court that seeks monetary damages of more than $100,000 against Phillips. Although attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom had requested that the case be dismissed, the court has decided to let it continue.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
If we don’t have the backbone for that, we deserve to lose.
This is outright harassment and a nuisance suit.
The transgender woman and her cohort lawyers need to be sued out of existence and then have her hormone therapy blocked!
Counter sue for twice the amount that they are suing for in this case.
While I agree that Civil War 2 is inevitable, I prefer to allow the Lord His time to bring justice to those in such error. It will be enough to erase the abomination that grants them rights that He has not given.
I wish some tranny would do this to some muslim baker. I wonder if these same homo groups would stand behind the trans.
The LEFT IS EVIL, VILE, VICIOUS DESTROYERS of GOOD PEOPLE and GOOD THINGS!!
Thank you for saying it before me. But I wouldn’t block hormone therapy. That is not a pretty sight, I’m sure.
Transgenderism is based on bad science.
Phillips made the terrible mistake, on the advice of his lawyers, to drop the civil rights violation lawsuit against the state of Colorado several years ago, when the state agreed not to come after him for THIS ‘violation.’ Showing Marxists any kind of perceived weakness like that only encourages them to up their game.
If the civil rights lawsuit had gone on, I guarantee you that this faggot cross dressing lawyer wouldn’t have attacked.
It can hardly be called “science” at all, Jim.
We're a country whose Congress and DOJ ignore and/or wink at outright treason. What do you expect?
It is not a transgender woman. It is a surgically mutilated man.
Common mistake, assuming decency will be reciprocated by indecent people.
no one in the msm is asking why they go to this bakery, it seems it is more to be able to file a lawsuit since they know their beliefs than making a cake
THere is no “good faith” possible here. And that implies everything that it sounds like it implies.
Of course not. It’s anti-science.
God is the ultimate Judge for this he-she . . .maybe no one told him-her.
Proof again that republicans lack a spine and future comprehension.
Why would the journalist use the word “infamous” to describe the owner of the bakery?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.