Remember the ‘powerful’ argument that any accuser such as Christine Blasey Ford has to be believed because she risks such damage to reputation and finances when she does such a ‘brave’ act. Has anyone noticed how this ‘argument’ appears to only apply to one side of the political spectrum?
Take the Lewinsky Affair where Linda Tripp was instrumental in the outcome with the DNA blue dress. She was arrested and tried for violating the law against surreptitious telephone recording in her conversations with Ms Lewinsky. She was acquitted but obviously had legal costs involved. There were multiple other offenses against her to the point of her suing the Justice & Defense Departments and winning $595k cash and other benefits in 2003. Yet she cited in a later interview that her settlement did not cover her costs.
Then we have Christine Blasey Ford and her very last minute accusation of an offense 30 years in the past against a sitting Federal Judge up for a Supreme Court seat. No contemporary confirmations, little details and a great deal of emotion. While it is now Judge Kavanaugh, she, Christine Blasey Ford, appears to have suffered nothing in the aftermath. Like another accuser, Anita Hill, she appears to have secured a hallowed place in the LEFT’s pantheon of ‘brave women’!
Hypocrites are Democrats ... hmmm?
In all honesty, I’m surprised the Dims are fighting so hard for Joe. They MUST know he’s a weak candidate. You’d think they’d want to find someone stronger, or, at the very least, someone who can string two sentences together.
TDS makes people do strange things.