[MortMan]

Your condescension does not enhance your point.

I know quite well the definition. Regardless of one’s opinion of Dr. Oz, he made the observation that the CCP virus on the Easy Coast, which has been shown to be more closely related genetically to the Iran and Europe infections, appears to be more virulent - that is, more severe and harmful - than the virus found on the west coast, which genetically appears to come primarily from direct import from Wuhan.

As I stated, the observation is certainly not dispositive. But I am not discounting its potential correctness of the observation just because I have historically not cared for Dr. Oz.

[BereanBrain]

Here’s a few opinions on Dr Quack (Oz) the creation of Oprah.

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/case-dr-oz-ethics-evidence-and-does-professional-self-regulation-work/2017-02

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/06/07/a-new-low-for-dr-oz

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-is-alleged-quack-dr-oz-giving-coronavirus-advice-on-the-today-show

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelschein/2018/05/25/dr-oz-makes-millions-even-though-hes-a-total-fraud-and-other-reasons-you-should-follow-his-lead/#1100b9025fe1

https://www.businessinsider.com/dr-oz-treatments-that-other-doctors-say-are-bogus-2015-4