Judiciary is not fit to resolve the dispute.
CASE CLOSED
the “Justices” care more about their pornography
than clean water and energy.
they care more about the children/$$$ they were GIVEN
to control their Decisions, then the People they
were supposed to PROTECT.
they should RESIGN.
interesting how the media is so interested in a multi-millionaire that became a politician but no has no interest in all the politicians that became multi-millionaires
It is an Amendment IV matter.
Unreasonable politically motivated searches are highly illegal.
aren’t the plaintiff’s requited to base the subpoena on a possible crime?? In this case, what is the crime they are charging POTUS with??
Simple questions often provide clarity:
WHO is asserting WHAT crime?
If no crime is asserted, then why is only one person being targeted by this “oversight”?
If a crime IS asserted, then why has no case been presented for indictment and why are the normal channels for prosecuting crimes not being used?
Funny..they said any questions about Obama’s records “lacked standing”.
So parsing that against this..?
You mean no political like abortion?
Looks like two three-judge panels from the Second Circuit amd a three-judge panel from the DC Circuit.
I wonder how the liberal Supreme Court justices would rule if a Republican led house were to subpoena a President Biden’s previous years medical records?