So if you wanted to discount the faux study why not start with an explanation, instead of running the entire negative up the flag poll before trying to point to any disagreement you might have with the report? You don’t see anything wrong with recommending that HCQ be used ONLY in a hospital setting, as you opined on another thread. Confusion is the tool of the globalist agenda. Don’t help them
Because the way FR is structured, you put the article first, then secondly you add your own personal comments. It’s always been that way. I follow the rules in that regard.
I DID highlight in bold and red the negatives in the directly quoted study excerpt I provided.