So by the time you are done testing one city the results of the other is no longer valid.
Ultimately, it will be businesses they require the testing of prospective customers and job-applicants. They’re already talking about how this would work - sport executives say they’ll quick-test people before letting them into stadiums, for example.
You’re “can’t do” attitude sounds like Democrats. In fact it reminds me of Dianne Feinstein, who opposed funding for the oil pipeline because “it would take to long” to get it done. As if every major project that’s worthwhile doesn’t require a scale-up in stages.
you ran away from my reply to the same statement of yours on a different thread. There is no way you can test 60k people on their way i to a stadium. Im not waiting in line 15 minutes for each member of my party to be tested before going into a restaurant. And thats if they are caught up on the tests of the people before me. Im not letting some amateur stick my finger several times a day before going into a store. What you suggest is not rational or possible. So stop posting multiple threads on how testing will solve the problem. It wont
So we are supposed to wait around for 10-15 minutes for a test result before going into a baseball game? How much extra will that add on to a ticket? Will you get a refund if they deny you entry? No thanks. Sports stadiums can stay empty. That is ludicrous.