Trump and Fox even pronounced OPENLY their hope that Gilead's Remdesivir would work. It's just that media is sooo tone deaf, they keep harping on Hydroxychloroquine alone.
Of course, this article now begins to tout Remdesivir. It says: "The thing that's interesting is that Trump could have bet on remdesivir." <--- WHY? Has it been proven already compared to Hydroxychloroquine?
Secondly, Trump did not say it is the silver bullet. He said Let doctors try it. He even said: "It may work, it may not work, but let's try". How is that calling it a silver bulet?
This article's title is attacking strawmen.
DemRATs will try to keep the economy in artificial depression until, they hope, they win the election in November at which time they’ll introduce a miracle cure for coronavirus called taxurassoff.
When exactly did Trump or Fox for that matter ever present Hydroxychloroquine as a silver bullet? My recollection is that Trump presented it as something that had according to reports shown a good success rate and that what was there to lose by trying it.
Hey, I just realized I wrote basically the same thing as you but not as well. Sorry I didn’t mean to Biden you.
Washington Compost, making the NY Slimes look Conservative.
agree, this article is wrong on so many facts and points, 1)Trump has been mentioning Remdesivir, 2)-the reason Hydroxychloroquine is mentioned so much is because there are so many positive reports and cases, 3) there are millions of users who use Hydrox low cost ,the heart attack report is fake news doctors on the scene did not attribute it to Hydroxychloroquine
this is simply unscientific reporting