[a little elbow grease]

(snip) ---"Last week, I reported a similar study from the town of Gangelt in north-western Germany where 15 percent of the population were found to have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Were that to be reflected in the wider population, it would still mean we were a long way short of the 60 percent infection rate which scientific advisers originally considered necessary for ‘herd immunity’ of the population. But it would mean we were well on the way."

"That scientists in Germany and California have been able to perform antibody tests on good-sized samples of the population yet again raises the question: why have we still not performed such studies elsewhere? One of the problems, we are told, is that antibody tests have proved inaccurate. The UK government bought a job lot of antibody tests from China and then decided they were useless. But surely we have the facilities to perform high-quality laboratory tests of the sort used in the Stanford and Gangelt studies? Isn’t it about time we got moving on this?"

________

The more I read of this article (and others) the more I think that:

.... NEARLY ALL THESE "EXPERTS" SHOULD BE PLACED IN A LARGE ROOM WITH A GOOD NUMBER OF VERY HUNGRY WILD CATS.

****************

OPEN THINGS UP

[GulfMan]

There is not accurate antibody test as of yet

[a fool in paradise]

Could there be something else circulating at a low threat level that would indicate the same as China virus? Something that may even account for natural immunity?