I don’t understand the legal process, when someone requests a new trial, and provides evidence to back up their request, that the same Judge who oversaw the sham trial, is then allowed to decide whether a new trial will be granted. It seems like a stacked deck, not a fair hearing that would lead to an unbiased decision.
On the contrary, I am inclined to think you understand it perfectly.
Exactly. Amy Berman Jackson trial was miss handled she clearly can’t be the judge that decided if the trial was miss handled