Posted on 04/14/2020 8:43:41 PM PDT by rintintin
You know, of course, you have to stay six feet away from others. And you know by now whether your job is considered essential enough for you to continue going to work.
But the revised emergency health order issued last week by Sacramento County to halt the spread of the coronavirus includes a long list of lesser-known but critical do and don’t-do directives you should be aware of.
Here are 16 of them, including the importance of taking care of pets and the value of taking your temperature:
(The order lasts until end of the day on May 1, unless extended by the county health officer.)
1. If you are an essential worker, your employer is supposed to check you for virus symptoms when you arrive at work. That typically involves taking the employee’s temperature. An elevated temperature is one key indicator of the virus.
2. At your workplace, all in-use desks and work stations must be placed at least six feet away from each other.
3. Employees of stores must remain six feet away from customers.
4. You can’t have visitors to your house, except to care for a sick family member or pet.
5. You can’t leave the county, unless you are conducting essential work, or caring for a sick family member out of county.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
?
That's tighter than even the fascist Gov. Whitless of Michigan's commands.
Note that some people are going to complain about no link or URL....
NOPE
Does this mean we are all going to die of the Wuhan-19 zombie apocalypses in the next 48 hours?
Asking for a neighbor.
The right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
If a citizen's liberty to travel is to be regulated, it must be pursuant to the lawmaking functions of Congress, any delegation of the power must be subject to adequate standards, and such delegated authority will be narrowly construed.
Nobody is observing all of those rules all of the time.
Wow...glad we’re not there...we leave our county and go to MIL house which we are taking care of. Its a less infectious, less populous county where we can kayak, bike, (as long as it’s not on trails, which the stupid governor closed.)
Too Many Taxes
Too Many Laws
Almost none of this is enforced.
Though some counties are stricter than others, Sacramento is more like unenforced house rules that everyone “should” adhere to.
In my county nobody is paying much attention to the bulk of the “rules”.
The Bee has been posting the names of non-essential businesses that have remained open. I guess the news media is considered essential to the Democratic Party. Now the Democrats are trying to get money to help out the media.
“You can’t leave the county”
Glad I don’t live in Sac. I am in the Bay Area and am traveling 50 miles to work and it means I traverse multiple counties.
These “rules” are BS. I do not know anyone that is sick and technically I am in that vulnerable age group being older than 60 years of age.
The case of Kent (Rockwell) v. Dulles was a passport case, one of several that the Communist Party USA waged against passport use/restriction laws. There was also one entitled Boudin v. Dulles, etc.
These older cases can be found in “Passport Reorganization Act of 1959”, Hearings before a Special Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, US Senate, 86th Congress, 1st Session on S. 2095 - Passport Reorganization Act of 1959”, Aug. 26, 27, and Sept. 1, 1959.
Other CPUSA cases cited in this publication were Browder v. U.S., Kent v. Dulles and possibly Dayton v. Dulles (Supreme Court cases).
US Circuit Courts of Appeal CP cases included Dulles v. Nathan (A German communist who came to the US as an aid to Albert Einstein at Princeton. Nathan was id. as a member of the CPUSA too. He’s listed in one of my congressional testimonies from documents I got from CP fronts.
Schactman v. Dulles, Robeson (Paul) v. Dulles (CPUSA and KGB asset, Boudin v. Dulles (Leonard Boudin, id. CP and father of Weathermen Kathy Boudin);
US District Courts, Nathan, Boudin, and Worthy v. Dulles (William Worthy, castroite Marxist).
Best passport case title: US District Courts:
* Wong Dick Wing v. Dulles, 140 F. Supp. 261 (S.D. N.Y. 1956) - ENJOY
Ad Blocker wall. And I’m not turning mine off.
Speaking of counties, not many people know that in that worker’s ‘paradise’ the good ole USSR, one could not travel outside of one’s small area (county) without papers. And the dirty little secret was they did not issue papers to most of the people. And if you did happen to be one of the lucky ones with papers, any small transgressions could have them taken away from you. It made it so much easier to control the people. No doubt some of the present day democRAT governors would love to institute such a system here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.