Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

I know. The 100,000-200,000 was a projection with mitigation, but the modelers had to guess at how effective mitigation might be. That type of model was never set in stone. They weren’t making some sort of prediction like Nostradamus. It was always meant to be revised as new data came in.


19 posted on 04/14/2020 12:21:14 AM PDT by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomForce

21 posted on 04/14/2020 12:32:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomForce; Trump Girl Kit Cat

China didn’t announce that they had a problem virus until December 31st. And until late January they were telling everyone that it only passed animal to human when they knew that wasn’t remotely the case. It was extremely infectious.

Our first US case didn’t happen until January 21st.

Models are built on available data. The only hard data at the end of January was that Covid-19 is another SARS virus, that it was spreading so fast in China that factories weren’t reopening after Lunar New Year, and that Italy it was in serious trouble.

The 2003 SARS had a death rate of nearly 9%. We don’t remember it because it only infected some 8,000 worldwide and barely affected the US. 775 died.

By late February Covid-19, SARS-2, had infected 82,000 people with an unknown death rate. Maybe it would be as high as the first SARS. No one knew. Wuxan, much bigger that NYC, was totally shut down and authorities were welding shut the exits of large apartment towers. China refused to let our virus hunters in to get a close look. In Italy their hospitals were overwhelmed and on the verge of collapse.

That was the situation when the CDC had to make estimates of how many could be killed by it. They didn’t have the luxury of two months of hindsight data available to the current armchair critics calling for their heads.


22 posted on 04/14/2020 12:41:40 AM PDT by Pelham (Mary McCord, Sally Yates and Michael Atkinson all belong in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomForce

“I know. The 100,000-200,000 was a projection with mitigation, but the modelers had to guess at how effective mitigation might be. That type of model was never set in stone. They weren’t making some sort of prediction like Nostradamus. It was always meant to be revised as new data came in.”

Really? The projections were meant to scare us to death so we’d abandon our livelihoods and go along with these draconian measures. You tell me: if the projections (which you’ve just admitted were worthless) had shown the reality, would the masses have been so willing to cower in their homes?


59 posted on 04/14/2020 5:08:10 AM PDT by LateBoomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomForce
The 100,000-200,000 was a projection with mitigation, but the modelers had to guess at how effective mitigation might be.

So we had our freedom taken and economy destroyed for the sake of “guesses” by “experts”. And somehow, this makes sense to people?

71 posted on 04/14/2020 6:14:21 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson