> On the other hand, OJ was found not guilty...
This is historically factual (at least at the criminal court level).
> but he killed two people.
Possibly. However, i wonder what is your constructive point (if any) (if i may, please allow me to express my doubt that you have one). OJ should have been shot while in policy custody a la LHO? OJ case justifies vigilante justice? State sanctioned death squads?
“OJ should have been shot while in policy custody a la LHO? OJ case justifies vigilante justice? State sanctioned death squads?“
The silliness is compounding exponentially, to use a popular phrase that’s going around.