Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus-Maximus

Hmmmm, the media says “A”.

A good many physicians and politicians (guess the party) say “B”.

Who to believe, who to believe?


3 posted on 04/11/2020 9:28:08 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Da Coyote

Oops, messed up that post so badly that I could be a studies or a journalism major.

Let’s try again:

Hmmmm, the media and politicians (guess the party) say “A”.

A good many physicians say “B”.

Who to believe, who to believe?


10 posted on 04/11/2020 9:33:57 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Da Coyote

“Who to believe, who to believe?”

I have a real problem here. How was the survey set up. It didn’t say “if the drug was approved or a safe dosage is determined individually.”

Physicians are really losing their credibility when a doctor is willing to use a drug on family and not on the general public. We don’t know who the docs were, but as you can see they are “supposedly,” professionals that are not willing to step forward with their opinion. If they are above board, they would never have been coerced into a hidden agenda national survey if they were professional.

They are violating, by insinuating they have a preference for like patients, their Hippocratic Oath - the new version:,

https://owlspace-ccm.rice.edu/access/content/user/ecy1/Nazi%20Human%20Experimentation/Pages/Hippocratic%20Oath-modern.html

So what we are left with here is a question of who the doctors were and their capacity, (Oculists don’t prescribe drugs of this nature), what the actual questions were, “do you only beat your wife on Tuesday?” And the survey was done by an employment agency that specializes in filling slots in the medical field. That doesn’t mean they have any idea of the capacity of the doctors they send except for education and experience in writing. But especially integrity in this case, are not within their grasp as their is no creditability to that except their oath to measure it. And obviously 65% have no integrity if they are willing to treat family over other patients, even illegally.

rwood


29 posted on 04/11/2020 10:43:10 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Da Coyote

Physician brother-in-law has already planned to offer this to everyone in our extended family. He is not aware of any peer in this area that would not offer this treatment routine provided the patient is medically qualified.


31 posted on 04/11/2020 10:47:41 AM PDT by Boomer One ( ToUsesn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Da Coyote
"Who to believe, who (not) to believe?"

Prens: mine; That half of the "who" depends on that person's medical history plus other factors...imho. The FDA has approved the drug for use...it is up to the Doctors now. Fuci and Brix should pull back.

By the way...Has the FDA approved cannabis yet for the treatment of anything?

34 posted on 04/11/2020 11:10:32 AM PDT by yoe (Want to HELP the Slave Trade and Drug Cartels in USA? Vote for a democrat........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson